<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411977</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s remand unjustified, lacking reasons and failing to challenge the lower authorities&#039; factual findings. Emphasizing judicial principles in remand and burden of proof under Section 68, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, highlighting the need for judicious exercise of remand powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 22:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411977</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s remand unjustified, lacking reasons and failing to challenge the lower authorities&#039; factual findings. Emphasizing judicial principles in remand and burden of proof under Section 68, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, highlighting the need for judicious exercise of remand powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>