https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411968 A promissory note and its part-payment endorsements were treated as proved and enforceable where the plaintiff's evidence and supporting testimony sufficiently established execution and the endorsements. The absence of an attesting witness did not, by itself, defeat proof of a negotiable instrument, and the defence that the document was incomplete or an inchoate stamped instrument failed on the facts. The second appeal disclosed no substantial question of law because the lower courts' findings rested on appreciation of evidence and were supported by the record. Concurrent decrees in favour of the plaintiff were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:06:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411968 A promissory note and its part-payment endorsements were treated as proved and enforceable where the plaintiff's evidence and supporting testimony sufficiently established execution and the endorsements. The absence of an attesting witness did not, by itself, defeat proof of a negotiable instrument, and the defence that the document was incomplete or an inchoate stamped instrument failed on the facts. The second appeal disclosed no substantial question of law because the lower courts' findings rested on appreciation of evidence and were supported by the record. Concurrent decrees in favour of the plaintiff were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411968