<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 82 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26503</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded a case involving penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act back to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Court considered the significant relief granted by the Appellate Tribunal, which reduced the gap between returned and assessed amounts below the 20% threshold. Acknowledging the changed dynamics, the Court emphasized the need for a fresh review by the Tribunal based on the revised figures, highlighting the importance of accurate assessments in determining penalty applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 82 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26503</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded a case involving penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act back to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Court considered the significant relief granted by the Appellate Tribunal, which reduced the gap between returned and assessed amounts below the 20% threshold. Acknowledging the changed dynamics, the Court emphasized the need for a fresh review by the Tribunal based on the revised figures, highlighting the importance of accurate assessments in determining penalty applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>