https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297476 Claims asserting that property was bought in another person's name from the real owner's funds are barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 unless pleaded facts establish a statutory exception, such as coparcenary holding for an HUF or a fiduciary relationship. Self-acquired funds followed by intestate succession do not, without more, establish coparcenary. Family relationship, joint residence, long occupation, or belongings remaining at the premises do not independently create an enforceable proprietary right. Where the occupant has no right in the property and is only a licensee, prior occupation does not support restoration of possession or interim protection; the available remedy, if any, is compensation rather than repossession. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:09:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297476 Claims asserting that property was bought in another person's name from the real owner's funds are barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 unless pleaded facts establish a statutory exception, such as coparcenary holding for an HUF or a fiduciary relationship. Self-acquired funds followed by intestate succession do not, without more, establish coparcenary. Family relationship, joint residence, long occupation, or belongings remaining at the premises do not independently create an enforceable proprietary right. Where the occupant has no right in the property and is only a licensee, prior occupation does not support restoration of possession or interim protection; the available remedy, if any, is compensation rather than repossession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297476