https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297473 An evicted licensee was held not entitled at the interim stage to restoration of access or use of the first floor, because Section 64 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 confines relief to compensation and the plea of irrevocable licence under Section 60(b) was not prima facie made out. The court also treated the requested access as a mandatory interim injunction and declined it. On the property-use issue, the court allowed the defendant in control to let out the vacant premises during suit, subject to conditions preserving the subject matter, because keeping it unused risked deterioration and loss and the plaintiff's specific performance claim appeared weak. en-us Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297473 An evicted licensee was held not entitled at the interim stage to restoration of access or use of the first floor, because Section 64 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 confines relief to compensation and the plea of irrevocable licence under Section 60(b) was not prima facie made out. The court also treated the requested access as a mandatory interim injunction and declined it. On the property-use issue, the court allowed the defendant in control to let out the vacant premises during suit, subject to conditions preserving the subject matter, because keeping it unused risked deterioration and loss and the plaintiff's specific performance claim appeared weak. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297473