https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297472 The High Court upheld the judgments and decrees in favor of the respondent/plaintiff for possession and injunction, dismissing the appeals. It held that the appellant's defences of benami were barred by Section 4(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court found that the property was not benami as the appellant failed to provide evidence that the funds for the property were provided by their father. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 16:57:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297472 The High Court upheld the judgments and decrees in favor of the respondent/plaintiff for possession and injunction, dismissing the appeals. It held that the appellant's defences of benami were barred by Section 4(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court found that the property was not benami as the appellant failed to provide evidence that the funds for the property were provided by their father. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297472