https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297469 Parol evidence is excluded under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to vary the terms of a written grant or disposition once its contents are proved. Proviso (4) allows proof of a later oral agreement to rescind or modify an earlier arrangement only when the underlying contract, grant or disposition is not required by law to be in writing and is not registered. Where the instrument is a registered settlement deed conferring rights, its terms cannot be altered, rescinded, or varied by oral evidence; any change must be made by a subsequent registered document. On that basis, the alleged later oral arrangement could not be proved and the challenge to the plaintiff's share failed. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 16:49:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297469 Parol evidence is excluded under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to vary the terms of a written grant or disposition once its contents are proved. Proviso (4) allows proof of a later oral agreement to rescind or modify an earlier arrangement only when the underlying contract, grant or disposition is not required by law to be in writing and is not registered. Where the instrument is a registered settlement deed conferring rights, its terms cannot be altered, rescinded, or varied by oral evidence; any change must be made by a subsequent registered document. On that basis, the alleged later oral arrangement could not be proved and the challenge to the plaintiff's share failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297469