https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297462 The High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that discrepancies in the cheque number and evidence of repayment through different cheques raised doubts. The respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139, shifting the burden of proof to the appellant, who failed to discharge it. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297462 The High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that discrepancies in the cheque number and evidence of repayment through different cheques raised doubts. The respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139, shifting the burden of proof to the appellant, who failed to discharge it. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297462