<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26496</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction of Rs. 10,000 under section 5(1)(vii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Tribunal found that the gift made to Surekha was not eligible for the deduction as she was not related to or dependent on the assessee at the time of the gift. The court answered the question in the affirmative against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26496</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction of Rs. 10,000 under section 5(1)(vii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Tribunal found that the gift made to Surekha was not eligible for the deduction as she was not related to or dependent on the assessee at the time of the gift. The court answered the question in the affirmative against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>