https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411924 The court held that if the tax liability was deducted before the dismissal of the appeal, the deposit requirement should be considered fulfilled. The respondent was directed to consider the application for condonation of delay and proceed with hearing the appeal on its merits. The order dismissing the appeal solely for non-deposit of the 10% amount was set aside, allowing the petitioner the opportunity for adjudication on the merits. The judgment disposed of the petition with these observations. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411924 The court held that if the tax liability was deducted before the dismissal of the appeal, the deposit requirement should be considered fulfilled. The respondent was directed to consider the application for condonation of delay and proceed with hearing the appeal on its merits. The order dismissing the appeal solely for non-deposit of the 10% amount was set aside, allowing the petitioner the opportunity for adjudication on the merits. The judgment disposed of the petition with these observations. Case-Laws GST Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411924