https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411910 The Tribunal found that the activity of labeling undertaken by the appellant amounted to manufacture. Consequently, the demands for recovery of wrongly availed CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties were set aside. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had not stayed the previous favorable decision for the appellant, and thus, the matter was not kept pending. en-us Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Sep 2021 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411910 The Tribunal found that the activity of labeling undertaken by the appellant amounted to manufacture. Consequently, the demands for recovery of wrongly availed CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties were set aside. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had not stayed the previous favorable decision for the appellant, and thus, the matter was not kept pending. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411910