<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening Tax Assessments After 4 Years Needs Evidence of Non-Disclosure, Invalid Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59542</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the assessment is sought to be reopened after the expiry of period of four years from the end of the relevant year, the proviso to Section 147 stipulates a requirement that there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment for that year. This stipulation does not govern a notice for reopening within a period of four years. In the case at hand, as noted earlier, there is not even a whisper about what fact was not disclosed. In our view, therefore, the notice to reopen under Section 148 of the said Act itself was issued without jurisdiction. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:26:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening Tax Assessments After 4 Years Needs Evidence of Non-Disclosure, Invalid Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59542</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the assessment is sought to be reopened after the expiry of period of four years from the end of the relevant year, the proviso to Section 147 stipulates a requirement that there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment for that year. This stipulation does not govern a notice for reopening within a period of four years. In the case at hand, as noted earlier, there is not even a whisper about what fact was not disclosed. In our view, therefore, the notice to reopen under Section 148 of the said Act itself was issued without jurisdiction. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:26:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>