<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 233 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee, concluding that not considering subsequent legal interpretations by higher courts constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. It held that excise subsidy refunds are capital receipts and should be excluded from computing book profit under Section 115JB. The order was pronounced on 02/09/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2021 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 233 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee, concluding that not considering subsequent legal interpretations by higher courts constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. It held that excise subsidy refunds are capital receipts and should be excluded from computing book profit under Section 115JB. The order was pronounced on 02/09/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>