<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26482</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the Department and against the assessee. The court found the remuneration paid to the employees excessive and unreasonable under section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The disallowance of part of the salary paid to employees during the assessment year 1970-71 was justified, and the application of section 37(2A) on entertainment expenditure was ruled in favor of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:57:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26482</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the Department and against the assessee. The court found the remuneration paid to the employees excessive and unreasonable under section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The disallowance of part of the salary paid to employees during the assessment year 1970-71 was justified, and the application of section 37(2A) on entertainment expenditure was ruled in favor of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>