<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 202 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411857</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were entitled to additional interest under Section 244A(1A) for the delayed refund period. The court clarified the distinction between &quot;fresh assessment&quot; and &quot;reassessment&quot; under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with orders giving effect to appellate decisions. The impugned order denying additional interest was quashed, allowing the petitioner to claim the interest amount, with directions for prompt payment by the respondents. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory timelines and ensuring fairness in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 202 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411857</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were entitled to additional interest under Section 244A(1A) for the delayed refund period. The court clarified the distinction between &quot;fresh assessment&quot; and &quot;reassessment&quot; under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with orders giving effect to appellate decisions. The impugned order denying additional interest was quashed, allowing the petitioner to claim the interest amount, with directions for prompt payment by the respondents. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory timelines and ensuring fairness in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>