<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 196 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411851</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Operational Creditor&#039;s appeal, confirming the claim&#039;s non-maintainability. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application under Section 12A, as it was not filed by the original applicant. The application was rejected due to procedural non-compliance regarding the filing of Form FA. Despite the rejection, the IRP&#039;s role in filing the withdrawal application was deemed compliant by the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the CIRP order against the Corporate Debtor, allowing it to operate through its Board of Directors and remitted the matter for determining CIRP costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 196 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411851</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Operational Creditor&#039;s appeal, confirming the claim&#039;s non-maintainability. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application under Section 12A, as it was not filed by the original applicant. The application was rejected due to procedural non-compliance regarding the filing of Form FA. Despite the rejection, the IRP&#039;s role in filing the withdrawal application was deemed compliant by the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the CIRP order against the Corporate Debtor, allowing it to operate through its Board of Directors and remitted the matter for determining CIRP costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>