<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 180 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on August 25, 2021. The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of applying seized cash during a survey was rejected, as the seized cash could not be adjusted against advance tax under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in adjusting the aforementioned interest against seized cash. Regarding the Section 271AAB penalty, both the Revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s cross-appeals were considered, with the Tribunal finding no basis to uphold the penalty due to lack of clarity in the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2021 21:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 180 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on August 25, 2021. The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of applying seized cash during a survey was rejected, as the seized cash could not be adjusted against advance tax under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in adjusting the aforementioned interest against seized cash. Regarding the Section 271AAB penalty, both the Revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s cross-appeals were considered, with the Tribunal finding no basis to uphold the penalty due to lack of clarity in the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>