<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 40 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26478</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the allowability of internal development expenditure and entitlement to export profit rebate. Legal expenses incurred in defending employees were deemed allowable deductions, but those for defending directors were not. However, losses on the purchase and sale of securities and bonds were not deductible as business losses. The court&#039;s decision favored the assessee on Questions 1 and 3, partially on Question 2, and favored the Revenue on Question 4. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 40 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26478</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the allowability of internal development expenditure and entitlement to export profit rebate. Legal expenses incurred in defending employees were deemed allowable deductions, but those for defending directors were not. However, losses on the purchase and sale of securities and bonds were not deductible as business losses. The court&#039;s decision favored the assessee on Questions 1 and 3, partially on Question 2, and favored the Revenue on Question 4. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>