<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (11) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297423</link>
    <description>A warrant for recovery of a fine may ordinarily be withdrawn once the offender has served the full default sentence, unless special reasons justify continuing recovery proceedings. Those reasons must relate to why the fine was not recovered before completion of the default imprisonment, such as late discovery of assets, later-acquired property, or insufficient time to execute the warrant. Factors unrelated to non-recovery, including the seriousness of the offence or allocation of part of the fine to the complainant, are not relevant. Where execution was already underway against immovable property before the default sentence ended, continued retention of the warrant may be justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 18:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (11) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297423</link>
      <description>A warrant for recovery of a fine may ordinarily be withdrawn once the offender has served the full default sentence, unless special reasons justify continuing recovery proceedings. Those reasons must relate to why the fine was not recovered before completion of the default imprisonment, such as late discovery of assets, later-acquired property, or insufficient time to execute the warrant. Factors unrelated to non-recovery, including the seriousness of the offence or allocation of part of the fine to the complainant, are not relevant. Where execution was already underway against immovable property before the default sentence ended, continued retention of the warrant may be justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>