https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297422 A final order under Section 145 CrPC determining temporary possession and preventing breach of peace cannot be quashed solely because civil litigation over the same property is pending. Section 145 does not decide title, and the pendency of a civil suit does not by itself invalidate a concluded and competent Magistrate's order. The proper course for the aggrieved party is to pursue relief before the civil court, which remains competent to determine possession independently. The High Court was therefore not justified in setting aside the Section 145 order, and the Magistrate's order was restored. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:40:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297422 A final order under Section 145 CrPC determining temporary possession and preventing breach of peace cannot be quashed solely because civil litigation over the same property is pending. Section 145 does not decide title, and the pendency of a civil suit does not by itself invalidate a concluded and competent Magistrate's order. The proper course for the aggrieved party is to pursue relief before the civil court, which remains competent to determine possession independently. The High Court was therefore not justified in setting aside the Section 145 order, and the Magistrate's order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297422