<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 47 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26472</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order directing the Income-tax Officer to pass two separate assessment orders for the periods before and after the partner&#039;s death. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Partnership Act, particularly section 42(c), over the Income-tax Act, was upheld. The retrospective insertion of a proviso in section 187(2) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 exempted cases of firm dissolution due to a partner&#039;s death from certain provisions. The judgment emphasized the impact of statutory amendments, leading to separate assessments for the distinct periods, and ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 47 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26472</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order directing the Income-tax Officer to pass two separate assessment orders for the periods before and after the partner&#039;s death. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Partnership Act, particularly section 42(c), over the Income-tax Act, was upheld. The retrospective insertion of a proviso in section 187(2) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 exempted cases of firm dissolution due to a partner&#039;s death from certain provisions. The judgment emphasized the impact of statutory amendments, leading to separate assessments for the distinct periods, and ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>