https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411805 Bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was considered in the context of the restrictive twin conditions in Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. The Court noted that commercial quantity MDMA was seized from an unclaimed parcel, but the parcel was not addressed to the petitioner and no contraband was recovered from his person or premises. The prosecution mainly relied on Section 67 statements, bank entries, IMEI details and messaging-app use, which the Court found insufficient at the bail stage to rule out reasonable grounds for believing the petitioner was not guilty. The absence of criminal antecedents also weighed against any likelihood of reoffending. Bail was granted. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:06:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411805 Bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was considered in the context of the restrictive twin conditions in Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act. The Court noted that commercial quantity MDMA was seized from an unclaimed parcel, but the parcel was not addressed to the petitioner and no contraband was recovered from his person or premises. The prosecution mainly relied on Section 67 statements, bank entries, IMEI details and messaging-app use, which the Court found insufficient at the bail stage to rule out reasonable grounds for believing the petitioner was not guilty. The absence of criminal antecedents also weighed against any likelihood of reoffending. Bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411805