<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 143 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s Order, finding the Application filed by the Respondent, a Proprietorship Firm, as maintainable. The Tribunal determined that the Adjudicating Authority did not exceed its powers in directing the Corporate Debtor to respond to the petition. The Appeal challenging the Common Order was dismissed for lack of merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 143 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s Order, finding the Application filed by the Respondent, a Proprietorship Firm, as maintainable. The Tribunal determined that the Adjudicating Authority did not exceed its powers in directing the Corporate Debtor to respond to the petition. The Appeal challenging the Common Order was dismissed for lack of merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>