<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 126 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411781</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal affirmed that the additions and deductions made by the assessee were supported by documentary evidence and aligned with the agreements and commercial decisions. The reassignment of contract receipts, deduction of service fee, and waiver of idling charges were deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:05:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 126 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411781</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal affirmed that the additions and deductions made by the assessee were supported by documentary evidence and aligned with the agreements and commercial decisions. The reassignment of contract receipts, deduction of service fee, and waiver of idling charges were deemed justified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>