<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 122 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411777</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad quashed the reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2008-09 due to insufficient reasons provided by the Assessing Officer under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of clearly indicating the escapement of taxable income in the reasons for reassessment, citing relevant legal precedents. As the reasons did not establish the link between the alleged omissions and the potential escapement of income, the reassessment was deemed invalid. This decision highlights the importance of precise reasoning in initiating reassessment proceedings and upholds the requirement for strict adherence to statutory provisions in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 122 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411777</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad quashed the reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2008-09 due to insufficient reasons provided by the Assessing Officer under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of clearly indicating the escapement of taxable income in the reasons for reassessment, citing relevant legal precedents. As the reasons did not establish the link between the alleged omissions and the potential escapement of income, the reassessment was deemed invalid. This decision highlights the importance of precise reasoning in initiating reassessment proceedings and upholds the requirement for strict adherence to statutory provisions in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>