<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 120 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee&#039;s failure to file returns voluntarily and subsequent admission of income post-investigation constituted concealment. Procedural objections regarding jurisdiction, specific charge, and satisfaction were dismissed based on judicial precedents. The appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 09:05:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 120 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee&#039;s failure to file returns voluntarily and subsequent admission of income post-investigation constituted concealment. Procedural objections regarding jurisdiction, specific charge, and satisfaction were dismissed based on judicial precedents. The appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>