https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297417 The Court held that the Enforcement Directorate's actions in continuing proceedings based on an expired provisional attachment order under Section 5(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were beyond the statutory scope. The Court directed the respondents to address the petitioner's contentions and restrained them from further actions under the expired order. The Court refused the respondents' request for a stay to maintain the status quo and prevent disruption of the legal process. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Sep 2021 22:51:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297417 The Court held that the Enforcement Directorate's actions in continuing proceedings based on an expired provisional attachment order under Section 5(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were beyond the statutory scope. The Court directed the respondents to address the petitioner's contentions and restrained them from further actions under the expired order. The Court refused the respondents' request for a stay to maintain the status quo and prevent disruption of the legal process. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297417