https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297400 While granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court held that conditions must be confined to securing the accused's presence, preventing flight from justice, and avoiding witness intimidation, on the same lines as Section 437(3). A direction requiring payment of maintenance to the wife and child, including arrears, was outside that limited bail jurisdiction because maintenance must ordinarily be determined by the competent court on evidence in appropriate proceedings. The maintenance condition was therefore held excessive and unsustainable and was set aside, while the remaining bail directions were left intact. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Sep 2021 17:31:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297400 While granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court held that conditions must be confined to securing the accused's presence, preventing flight from justice, and avoiding witness intimidation, on the same lines as Section 437(3). A direction requiring payment of maintenance to the wife and child, including arrears, was outside that limited bail jurisdiction because maintenance must ordinarily be determined by the competent court on evidence in appropriate proceedings. The maintenance condition was therefore held excessive and unsustainable and was set aside, while the remaining bail directions were left intact. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297400