<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 90 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411745</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing that the recovery of dues was subject to the IBC provisions and the liquidation process. It highlighted that the scope of the petition was limited to recovering amounts due, and decisions regarding the revival of a PSU were policy matters. The petitioner was advised to approach the liquidator for any dues upon asset sales, maintaining the legal discipline outlined in the IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 90 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411745</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing that the recovery of dues was subject to the IBC provisions and the liquidation process. It highlighted that the scope of the petition was limited to recovering amounts due, and decisions regarding the revival of a PSU were policy matters. The petitioner was advised to approach the liquidator for any dues upon asset sales, maintaining the legal discipline outlined in the IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>