<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 83 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the issue to the Adjudicating Authority for quantifying the admissible credit. The appellant was directed to submit evidence for availing credit, and the Adjudicating Authority was instructed to examine the evidence and allow admissible credit, passing an order within six weeks of submission. The appeal was allowed to the extent indicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 83 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the issue to the Adjudicating Authority for quantifying the admissible credit. The appellant was directed to submit evidence for availing credit, and the Adjudicating Authority was instructed to examine the evidence and allow admissible credit, passing an order within six weeks of submission. The appeal was allowed to the extent indicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>