<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was invalidated due to discrepancies between the grounds for penalty initiation and imposition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of aligning penalty imposition with the specified grounds in the initiation notice, citing legal precedents to support the decision. The importance of procedural clarity and statutory compliance in penalty proceedings was upheld, leading to the penalty order being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was invalidated due to discrepancies between the grounds for penalty initiation and imposition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of aligning penalty imposition with the specified grounds in the initiation notice, citing legal precedents to support the decision. The importance of procedural clarity and statutory compliance in penalty proceedings was upheld, leading to the penalty order being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>