https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411735 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT Credit for services at a depot outside the factory. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 4(3)(c)(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the eligibility of credits for services used up to the place of removal, following previous judicial decisions. The appellant's appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to specific definitions and provisions under the relevant laws in determining credit eligibility. en-us Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:59:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411735 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT Credit for services at a depot outside the factory. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 4(3)(c)(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the eligibility of credits for services used up to the place of removal, following previous judicial decisions. The appellant's appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to specific definitions and provisions under the relevant laws in determining credit eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411735