<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 76 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal and clarifying that interest is chargeable on the differential duty paid after the removal of goods when the price was provisional. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, establishing that interest is applicable from the due date of clearance of goods until the payment of the differential duty, ensuring compliance with duty payment obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 76 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal and clarifying that interest is chargeable on the differential duty paid after the removal of goods when the price was provisional. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, establishing that interest is applicable from the due date of clearance of goods until the payment of the differential duty, ensuring compliance with duty payment obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>