<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26455</link>
    <description>The court quashed the acquisition proceedings due to the non-publication of the Gazette notice within the prescribed period, ambiguity in the notice, and the failure to provide reasons and allow inspection. The petitions were granted, and the rule was made absolute without costs to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26455</link>
      <description>The court quashed the acquisition proceedings due to the non-publication of the Gazette notice within the prescribed period, ambiguity in the notice, and the failure to provide reasons and allow inspection. The petitions were granted, and the rule was made absolute without costs to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>