<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297385</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues either dismissed, allowed for statistical purposes, or remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the significance of comprehensive reasoning and evaluation of all pertinent factors in tax assessment cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 21:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297385</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues either dismissed, allowed for statistical purposes, or remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the significance of comprehensive reasoning and evaluation of all pertinent factors in tax assessment cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>