<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1752 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297388</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition towards long-term capital gains under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT considered the sale value of &amp;amp;8377; 72 lakhs, realized amidst litigation, as the market value of the property, emphasizing that it adequately reflected the property&#039;s circumstances and drawbacks. The Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation was deemed too low, and the ITAT concluded that no adjustment was necessary in computing the long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 21:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1752 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297388</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition towards long-term capital gains under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT considered the sale value of &amp;amp;8377; 72 lakhs, realized amidst litigation, as the market value of the property, emphasizing that it adequately reflected the property&#039;s circumstances and drawbacks. The Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation was deemed too low, and the ITAT concluded that no adjustment was necessary in computing the long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>