<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Dishonor Case Dismissed: Managers Cleared as Company Not Named an Accused Despite Signing Cheque.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59476</link>
    <description>Dishonor of cheque - Insufficient Funds - In the absence of company (society) arraigned as accused, a complaint against the petitioners was therefore not maintainable. The petitioners being employed as General Manager and Branch Manager have signed the cheque, therefore, the proceedings against the petitioners are liable to be quashed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:59:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:59:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Dishonor Case Dismissed: Managers Cleared as Company Not Named an Accused Despite Signing Cheque.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59476</link>
      <description>Dishonor of cheque - Insufficient Funds - In the absence of company (society) arraigned as accused, a complaint against the petitioners was therefore not maintainable. The petitioners being employed as General Manager and Branch Manager have signed the cheque, therefore, the proceedings against the petitioners are liable to be quashed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:59:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>