<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 40 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411695</link>
    <description>The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque issued as repayment for a loan. The court found the accused&#039;s defenses unsubstantiated, upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, and dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition. The accused&#039;s financial capacity to lend the loan amount was confirmed, and the sentence was deemed appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 40 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411695</link>
      <description>The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque issued as repayment for a loan. The court found the accused&#039;s defenses unsubstantiated, upheld the lower courts&#039; judgments, and dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition. The accused&#039;s financial capacity to lend the loan amount was confirmed, and the sentence was deemed appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>