<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 39 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D due to the absence of exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant year. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and affirmed it based on judicial precedents, concluding that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable without any exempt income being received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 39 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D due to the absence of exempt income earned by the assessee during the relevant year. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and affirmed it based on judicial precedents, concluding that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable without any exempt income being received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>