<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 22 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411677</link>
    <description>The Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, affirming the Appellants&#039; entitlement to interest on the delayed refund from the date of the original application, January 1, 2008. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial discipline and the retrospective effect of judicial decisions in determining the Appellants&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 22 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411677</link>
      <description>The Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, affirming the Appellants&#039; entitlement to interest on the delayed refund from the date of the original application, January 1, 2008. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial discipline and the retrospective effect of judicial decisions in determining the Appellants&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>