<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 4 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, a contract manufacturing unit for biscuits, in a case concerning alleged contravention of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant was initially found to have contravened the rules, but the Order-in-Appeal was later rejected. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant based on a precedent set by a Larger Bench decision involving a similar issue. The legality of the issuance of Input Service Distributors&#039; invoice by the principal manufacturer to the contract manufacturing unit was upheld, following the precedent and similarity of facts, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 4 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, a contract manufacturing unit for biscuits, in a case concerning alleged contravention of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant was initially found to have contravened the rules, but the Order-in-Appeal was later rejected. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant based on a precedent set by a Larger Bench decision involving a similar issue. The legality of the issuance of Input Service Distributors&#039; invoice by the principal manufacturer to the contract manufacturing unit was upheld, following the precedent and similarity of facts, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>