<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 22 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26443</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the value of materials from gross receipts for net profit calculation was unjustified. The court emphasized the importance of establishing control over materials in contract work to determine profit accurately. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for a reassessment based on the control of materials by either the assessee or the Department, directing the Tribunal to determine the rate of profit accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 22 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26443</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the value of materials from gross receipts for net profit calculation was unjustified. The court emphasized the importance of establishing control over materials in contract work to determine profit accurately. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for a reassessment based on the control of materials by either the assessee or the Department, directing the Tribunal to determine the rate of profit accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>