<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2009 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297372</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondents are liable to pay 50% unearned increase (UEI) upon transferring the plot due to a demerger. The Court interpreted clause 6(a) of the Lease Deed to include transfers without consideration, obligating UEI payment. Policy instructions on UEI apply to demergers, and the demand and show cause notices issued by the appellant were deemed valid and enforceable. The Single Judge&#039;s decision upholding the notices was reinstated, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:17:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2009 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297372</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the respondents are liable to pay 50% unearned increase (UEI) upon transferring the plot due to a demerger. The Court interpreted clause 6(a) of the Lease Deed to include transfers without consideration, obligating UEI payment. Policy instructions on UEI apply to demergers, and the demand and show cause notices issued by the appellant were deemed valid and enforceable. The Single Judge&#039;s decision upholding the notices was reinstated, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>