<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1556 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297371</link>
    <description>Petitioners arrested in connection with an offence under the Customs Act, 1962 were found entitled to bail after the Court considered the nature of the accusation, the quantity of gold attributed to each petitioner, and the stage of investigation. As the petitioners had remained in custody for 35 days and further custodial detention was not considered necessary for investigative purposes, bail was granted on terms and conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1556 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297371</link>
      <description>Petitioners arrested in connection with an offence under the Customs Act, 1962 were found entitled to bail after the Court considered the nature of the accusation, the quantity of gold attributed to each petitioner, and the stage of investigation. As the petitioners had remained in custody for 35 days and further custodial detention was not considered necessary for investigative purposes, bail was granted on terms and conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>