https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, Junior Basic Teachers (JBTs), allowing them to count their contractual period as qualifying service for pension and annual increments. The court held that the petitioners, appointed against regular posts and senior to Vidya Upasaks, were entitled to the same benefits as Vidya Upasaks. The court rejected the State's argument of limitation, delay, and laches, allowing the claims within a reasonable time frame. Additionally, the court upheld the judgment in Joga Singh's case, directing the State to grant the petitioners the same benefits as Vidya Upasaks. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:17:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, Junior Basic Teachers (JBTs), allowing them to count their contractual period as qualifying service for pension and annual increments. The court held that the petitioners, appointed against regular posts and senior to Vidya Upasaks, were entitled to the same benefits as Vidya Upasaks. The court rejected the State's argument of limitation, delay, and laches, allowing the claims within a reasonable time frame. Additionally, the court upheld the judgment in Joga Singh's case, directing the State to grant the petitioners the same benefits as Vidya Upasaks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370