<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1501 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370</link>
    <description>Contract teachers appointed against sanctioned posts and later regularised were treated as entitled to count their earlier contractual service as qualifying service for pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 and for annual increments, applying the parity and continuity principles drawn from the earlier Joga Singh line of cases. The claim was not defeated by limitation, delay, laches or acquiescence in the facts, although arrears were confined to three years before filing. The earlier final decision remained binding for similarly situated employees, and hostile discrimination was avoided by extending the same service benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1501 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370</link>
      <description>Contract teachers appointed against sanctioned posts and later regularised were treated as entitled to count their earlier contractual service as qualifying service for pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 and for annual increments, applying the parity and continuity principles drawn from the earlier Joga Singh line of cases. The claim was not defeated by limitation, delay, laches or acquiescence in the facts, although arrears were confined to three years before filing. The earlier final decision remained binding for similarly situated employees, and hostile discrimination was avoided by extending the same service benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>