<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1150 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297375</link>
    <description>Under Section 439 CrPC in proceedings for offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act, the Court assessed the value of seized gold bars separately for each accused and found the attributable value below the statutory threshold. Taking account of the custody already undergone, it held that continued detention was not justified in the facts of the case. Bail was therefore granted to both petitioners, subject to bail bonds, sureties and other specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1150 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297375</link>
      <description>Under Section 439 CrPC in proceedings for offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act, the Court assessed the value of seized gold bars separately for each accused and found the attributable value below the statutory threshold. Taking account of the custody already undergone, it held that continued detention was not justified in the facts of the case. Bail was therefore granted to both petitioners, subject to bail bonds, sureties and other specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>