<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 721 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297355</link>
    <description>Payment under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 had to be made within ninety days of the application. A third instalment paid after the due date did not satisfy the scheme requirement, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position. Even so, the payer remained entitled to seek refund or adjustment of the belated amount. The proper course was to move the competent Commissioner of Income-tax, who was required to decide the application in accordance with the law declared by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:16:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 721 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297355</link>
      <description>Payment under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 had to be made within ninety days of the application. A third instalment paid after the due date did not satisfy the scheme requirement, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position. Even so, the payer remained entitled to seek refund or adjustment of the belated amount. The proper course was to move the competent Commissioner of Income-tax, who was required to decide the application in accordance with the law declared by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>