https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26434 The Full Bench resolved a conflict between two Division Bench decisions regarding the partition of Hindu undivided family property. It held that in a family with only one male member, no partition is possible as the sole owner cannot divide the property. The court emphasized that the wife is entitled to maintenance only and has no share in the joint family property. Ultimately, the Full Bench overruled one decision and concluded that in a family with a sole surviving coparcener, partition with the wife is not possible. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:07:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26434 The Full Bench resolved a conflict between two Division Bench decisions regarding the partition of Hindu undivided family property. It held that in a family with only one male member, no partition is possible as the sole owner cannot divide the property. The court emphasized that the wife is entitled to maintenance only and has no share in the joint family property. Ultimately, the Full Bench overruled one decision and concluded that in a family with a sole surviving coparcener, partition with the wife is not possible. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26434