<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CENVAT Credit Reversal Overturned: Rule 6(6) Justifies Appellant&#039;s Suo-Moto Re-Credit for Mega Project Exemption Inputs.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59431</link>
    <description>Reversal of cenvat credit - inputs used for the output goods supplied to BHEL under exemption for Mega Project - Job-Work - When the appellant took suo-moto re-credit, the same amounts to only correction of accounts, to which Rule 9(1) has no application - it is held that Rule 6(6) is squarely applicable in the present case, and therefore the credit was rightly taken by the appellant. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CENVAT Credit Reversal Overturned: Rule 6(6) Justifies Appellant&#039;s Suo-Moto Re-Credit for Mega Project Exemption Inputs.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59431</link>
      <description>Reversal of cenvat credit - inputs used for the output goods supplied to BHEL under exemption for Mega Project - Job-Work - When the appellant took suo-moto re-credit, the same amounts to only correction of accounts, to which Rule 9(1) has no application - it is held that Rule 6(6) is squarely applicable in the present case, and therefore the credit was rightly taken by the appellant. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>