<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Grants 12% Interest on Refund Delayed Without Legal Authority; Rejected Section 11AB Defense by Revenue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59430</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed refund - if Revenue is of the view that this amount could not be collected at that stage, the Revenue was free to refund the said amount but the respondent enjoyed the amount without any authority of law. - The ld. AR failed to show that in case the amount deposited under protest is governed under Section 11AB of the Act for claims of interest. - Interest @12% granted - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:13:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Grants 12% Interest on Refund Delayed Without Legal Authority; Rejected Section 11AB Defense by Revenue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59430</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed refund - if Revenue is of the view that this amount could not be collected at that stage, the Revenue was free to refund the said amount but the respondent enjoyed the amount without any authority of law. - The ld. AR failed to show that in case the amount deposited under protest is governed under Section 11AB of the Act for claims of interest. - Interest @12% granted - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:13:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>